Trust
Why you should be skeptical of this site
Skepticism is the right starting point for health information. We would rather earn trust by being explicit about our limits than by sounding certain.
Any health site can sound authoritative. That is not the same thing as being right.
Brain fog overlaps with many conditions, and overconfident sorting systems can mislead people fast.
Strong mechanism language can still outrun strong evidence if nobody keeps checking it.
A useful site should tell you what it cannot know, not only what it thinks it knows.
What we can do
- Help you organize a messy pattern into something more testable
- Show which mechanisms and causes fit better or worse
- Suggest biomarkers and low-risk experiments to discuss or track
- Make it easier to prepare for a focused clinical conversation
What we cannot do
- Diagnose you from one story
- Replace a clinician
- Guarantee a root cause
- Predict deterioration from passive phone data
Use the site the same way you should use any strong clinical framework: as a way to sharpen judgment, not outsource it.